Pitfalls to Avoid When Setting Up a DevOps Centre of Excellence

Creating a centre of excellence (CoE) can help promote knowledge-sharing among colleagues and facilitate DevOps adoption. DevOps is rapidly gaining traction, but questions remain about how this relatively new approach to culture, automation, and platform design can deliver on its promises. “Many organizations continue to face challenges in implementing and scaling a DevOps practise.

 

 

 

With the growing popularity of hybrid and remote work, knowledge sharing among colleagues is unlikely to happen organically, and developers will revert to their preferred processes. Putting together a CoE can help you meet these challenges and promote DevOps adoption, but you must avoid these 6 common pitfalls.

 

 

 

  • Misunderstanding of the term “DevOps”

 

 

 

DevOps engineers, however, believe that the goal is to solve all DevOps-related problems, even though DevOps is about collaborating between developers and operators.

 

 

 

Developers must understand how their applications work in order to keep them running and potentially call support if they fail. Operations departments must learn how to scale and understand metrics in order to implement larger monitoring and surveillance strategies.

 

 

 

Hire experts who meet your specific DevOps experience requirements and allow people to learn other skills along the way. Hiring people who are eager to learn will assist you in assembling the best team for your organisation.

 

 

 

  • No Clarity in Task / Mission

 

 

 

Without a common understanding of its purpose, the CoE (Centre of Excellence) will struggle to identify objectives and will be forced to justify its work.

 

 

 

It is critical to define the scope and structure of the project. Consider the following questions in terms of scope: Will the CoE simply implement effective methods, or will an overhaul of DevOps tooling across the enterprise be in the works? Are there specific goals for the CoE, or will it promote innovation more broadly?

 

 

 

The structure of a CoE varies according to the enterprise. Some enterprises dedicate a full-time team, while others connect experts from various organizations to improve DevOps practices.

 

 

 

  • The Detached CoE

 

 

 

Although creating a CoE can ensure a team’s commitment to continuous improvement in the DevOps Process, find a way to keep the CoE. It may be difficult to integrate with the team at the same time. Some CoEs become an additional silo, potentially isolating themselves from the rest of the company.

 

 

 

Ensure the CoE stays attuned to the nuances of the DevOps processes used by teams across the organization by keeping them working on real-world projects.

 

 

 

  • Unplanned delivery

 

 

 

To shorten automated response and test cycles, developers will occasionally perform continuous delivery (CD) and continuous integration (CI) simultaneously. The practise of CI/CD has several benefits for quick software delivery. The danger is that the usefulness of automated testing before scaling is compromised by the delivery of improper code configurations to production settings without sufficient investigation of their impact.

 

 

 

Checking your code before it goes through the complete software delivery lifecycle is still crucial in our opinion. Developers should have access to staging areas (pre-deployment and testing tiers) where they can patch and address issues that might occur if they push their code straight to the production environment. Setting up monitoring before the code is provided to the user is also crucial.

 

 

 

  • Prioritizing speed over quality

 

 

 

Many businesses place a lot of emphasis on product delivery at the expense of product quality. It is simple for quality to deteriorate if the effort’s key performance indicators (KPIs) exclusively focus on time to production. Future versions will not include endpoints that could monitor performance, and because it was developed quickly, software that is not yet ready for production is seen as successful.

 

 

 

A key DevOps value is achieving gains in speed and quality. This is challenging to accomplish and calls for developers and operators to design tests in novel and enhanced ways. Hopefully, it will boost both speed and quality simultaneously.

 

 

 

  • Lack of measurement and demonstration of ROI

 

 

 

The CoE must show ROI, just like any other team, in order to convince key decision-makers of the value it brings to the company. If not, management might reduce the CoE’s budget.

 

 

 

To encourage maturity DevOps the benefit of the procedure, CoE Understanding the main metrics that must be tracked to demonstrate performance is important. They should be able to quantify the cost of maintaining or refactoring bad code and stress how code quality is rising. CoE It must demonstrate how his work’s return on investment can encourage future investment.

 

 

 

  • Conclusion

 

 

 

A successful DevOps program requires optimal CI/CD (continuous integration/continuous delivery) practices. Using Amvion’s Managed DevOps Services, you can deploy the software rapidly while facilitating a faster and more effective got-to-market process by delivering a continuous flow of code into production and fixing bugs as quickly as possible.

Smarter Social Engineering Attacks & how to prevent it | Amvionlabs

Social engineering attacks account for a large portion of all cyber-attacks, and studies show that they are becoming more common. Over 90% of successful hacks and data breaches begin with a type of social engineering attack. Cybercriminals launch a cyberattack by taking advantage of human frailties and behaviour that lead the victim to provide sensitive information that the attacker then utilises fraudulently. Additionally, they employ strategies that involve deception and scare tactics in an effort to strip the victim of all control over his network system(s) so that he is then compelled to comply with ransom demands.

 

 

 

These are the most common types of social engineering attacks to be aware of

 

 

 

Phishing

 

 

 

Phishing emails are malicious emails that contain links or attachments that install malware on your device. We’ve all received scam emails, but some are more difficult to detect! Social engineers can spoof email addresses to appear to be from a boss or a trusted source.

 

 

 

Vhishing is an abbreviation for “voice phishing.” It’s the phone equivalent of email phishing, in which a bad actor calls instead of sending emails to steal sensitive information. These calls frequently use fear and urgency to elicit quick, impulsive call-backs.

 

 

 

Bad actors don’t just leave deceptive voicemails; they’ve also mastered texting! They’re sending targeted SMS messages to phish from your work phone or personal device. This is called as Phishing via SMS (Smishing)

 

 

 

Whaling

 

 

 

Whaling is a type of phishing that specifically targets top-level business executives and government agency heads. Whaling attacks typically spoof the email addresses of other high-ranking individuals in the company or agency and contain urgent messaging about a bogus emergency or time-sensitive opportunity. Because of the high-level network access these executives and directors have, successful whaling attacks can expose a lot of confidential, sensitive information.

 

 

 

A vishing phone call is when a con artist employs social engineering to induce you to divulge financial and personal information, including account numbers and passwords. The con artist may claim that your account has been compromised, pose as a representative of police enforcement or your bank, or they may offer to assist you in installing software. It’s probably malware, so beware.

 

 

 

Using emails to launch specialized assaults against people and companies, spear phishing is a type of cybercrime. These emails frequently include attachments with dangerous links to spyware, ransomware, or other harmful software. The email will also shamelessly demand a quick response from the receiver, such as a money transfer for a specified amount or the giving of private information like a banking password.

 

 

 

This is a more targeted version of the phishing scam whereby an attacker chooses specific individuals or enterprises. They then tailor their messages based on characteristics, job positions, and contacts belonging to their victims to make their attack less conspicuous. Spear phishing requires much more effort on behalf of the perpetrator and may take weeks and months to pull off. They’re much harder to detect and have better success rates if done skillfully.

 

 

 

Tailgating and Piggybacking

 

 

 

Tailgating is a simple social engineering attack that allows physical access to an unauthorized location. Tailgating is accomplished by closely following an authorized user into the area without being noticed. Piggybacking is very similar to tailgating. The primary distinction between the two is that in a piggybacking scenario, the authorized user is aware and allows the other person to “piggyback” on their credentials.

 

 

 

Best practices to prevent social engineering attacks:

 

 

 

Establish a security awareness campaign

 

 

 

Organizations can start a security awareness programme and train their employees to combat social engineering attacks. The programme should address both general phishing attacks and new, targeted cyber threats. Training is not a one-time event; educate your employees on a regular basis and test the efficacy of your programme.

 

 

 

A cyber security awareness education can be helpful for even the most tech-savvy employee. A good course will always cover a variety of interesting techniques and actual instances that clearly illustrate the dangers posed by social engineering attacks. Awareness training assists employees in understanding and identifying potential hazards they may experience in the digital workplace, from simulated attacks to routine password checks.

 

 

 

Implement multi-factor authentication

 

 

 

By using multi-factor authentication, you can ensure the safety of your accounts. This two-step verification process requires the presentation of two or more forms of identification proof before a user may access an application.
Multi-factor authentication strengthens the security of your sign-in processes, adding an extra layer of defence to your defences. This is especially useful when businesses use Internet-connected services, such as cloud applications.

 

 

 

Keep your antivirus/antimalware software updated

 

 

 

Make sure automatic updates are engaged, or make it a habit to download the latest signatures first thing each day. Periodically check to make sure that the updates have been applied, and scan your system for possible infections.

 

 

 

Conclusion

 

 

 

Currently, user education and technological defences are the best defences against social engineering. Amvion Managed Security Services uses a proactive approach to cyber security in order to keep cyber criminals at bay. We can assist you. We provide a variety of services that will make your organisation less vulnerable to social engineering threats, ranging from employee awareness training to vulnerability management.